Michael D. Ramsey

               Professor of Law, University of San Diego Law School

|     bio     |     c.v.     |     list of publications     |     ssrn author page     |     law school website page     |

Constitutional Law I Spring 2026 Course Webpage

COURSE OVERVIEW

 

Class Meetings:  Monday & Wednesday, 1:00 pm to 2:20 pm

 

Office Hours:     9:00 am to 12:00 pm Tuesday

3:00 pm to 4:00 pm Monday & Wednesday

 

                                  

Textbook: The required text is Gregory E. Maggs & Peter J. Smith, Constitutional Law: A Contemporary Approach (6th ed., West 2023). Note: earlier editions are not acceptable substitutes.

 

There will be supplemental readings available for download from this web page.

 

INFORMATION REGARDING THE COURSE

 

This space will be used for announcements regarding class cancellations, make-ups, optional events of interest, and other updates regarding the course and the course schedule.

 

I anticipate that Writing Assignment No. 2 will be assigned on March 18 and will be due on Monday, March 23, at 10 am.

I anticipate that class will be cancelled on Wednesday, March 18, 2026.  There will be a makeup via an asynchronous recording.

NO CLASS Monday, March 9, 2026  or Wednesday, March 11, 2026 (Spring Break)

A new reading list (unit 2—federalism) is available below.

Writing Assignment No. 1 (available below) is due at 10:00 am on Monday, February 16.

Here is a link to the oral argument in Trump v. Slaughter (the FTC removal case), which I highly recommend.

 

Here is a link to the oral argument in Learning Resources v. Trump (the tariffs case), which is also of interest although much of the discussion is on statutory interpretation.

 

Recordings of this class will be available to enrolled students via Panopto.  I do not vouch for the quality or usefulness of these recordings and they are not a substitute for attending class.  Only students in this course are authorized to view or listen to the recordings.  The recordings are only for personal use in connection with this course.  Students may not show them to others, post them on the internet or otherwise distribute or provide access to them or any part of them. The recordings will be automatically deleted from Panopto after the final exam and students should not attempt to retain them or any part of them.

The syllabus and readings for Unit 1 of the course are available below.

As stated in the syllabus available below, the final examination in this course will be closed book/notes.

 

COURSE ASSIGNMENTS

 

This space will be used to post assignments for each class meeting; these assignments will also be announced in class. The list of readings for Unit 1 (separation of powers) and Unit 2 (federalism) are available below.

 

Assignment for Monday, March 16, 2026

 

Reading List Part VI, focus on Crosby and Gade in the supplemental reading [available below] and Silkwood in the text.

 

NO CLASS Monday, March 9, 2026  or Wednesday, March 11, 2026 (Spring Break)

 

Assignment for Wednesday, March 4, 2026

 

Reading List Part V, focus on Gregory and Bond in the supplemental reading [available below] and New York v. U.S. and Printz v. U.S. in the text

 

A sample federalism hypothetical (optional, not to turn in) is available below.

 

Assignment for Monday, March 2, 2026

 

Reading List Part IV.A (taxing power), focus on NFIB v. Sebelius [part 2]

 

Reading List Part IV.B (spending power), focus on South Dakota v. Dole and NFIB v. Sebelius [part 3]

 

Assignment for Wednesday, February 25, 2026

 

Reading List Part III, focus on Lopez, Morrison, Raich, and NFIB v. Sebelius [Part 1]

 

Assignment for  Monday, February 23, 2026

 

New Reading List Part II.B, C & D, focus on Jones & Laughlin, Wickard, Heart of Atlanta and McClung

 

Assignment for Wednesday, February 18, 2026

 

New Reading List [available below], Part I and Part II.A, focus on McCulloch and Gibbons.

 

Assignment for Monday, February 16, 2026

 

Reading List Part V.D, E & F, focus on Nixon v. United States and on Zivotofsky v. Clinton in the supplemental reading.

 

Writing Assignment No. 1 (available below) is due at 10:00 am on Monday, February 16.

 

Assignment for Wednesday, February 11, 2026

 

Reading List Part V.A, B & C (standing), focus on Lujan and the Massachusetts v. EPA case in the supplemental reading (available below)

 

Assignment for Monday, February 9, 2026

 

Reading List Part IV, focus on Marbury v. Madison

 

A tariff-related hypothetical essay question, based on Learning Resources v. Trump, is posted below.  This is just for practice and is not to turn in or discuss in any detail in class.

 

Assignment for Wednesday, February 4, 2026

 

Reading List Part III.F & G, focus on Morrison v. Olson and Seila Law v. CFPB.  We will also consider Myers and Humphreys from the previous assignment.

 

Assignment for Monday, February 2, 2026

 

Reading List Part III.C, D & E, focus on Lucia and Bowsher

Re-read Article II, Section 2 relating to appointments

 

A sample multiple choice question relating to executive immunity is posted below (Constitutional Law Hypothetical No. 3).  This is just for practice and is not to turn in or discuss in any detail in class.

 

Assignment for Wednesday, January 28, 2026

 

Reading List Part III.A & B, focus on Whitman and Chadha, plus Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy and related notes and comments (in the supplement available below)

 

Assignment for Monday, January 26, 2026

 

Reading List Part II.G & H, focus on U.S. v. Nixon, Nixon v. Fitzgerald, Clinton v. Jones and especially Trump v. United States

Reading List Part II.I (summary and review)

 

Supplemental Reading #3 (Reading List Part II.H, excerpting Trump v. United States) is available below.

 

A sample multiple choice question relating to executive power is posted below (Constitutional Law Hypothetical No. 2).  This is just for practice and is not to turn in or discuss in any detail in class.

 

Assignment for Wednesday, January 21, 2026

 

Reading List Part II.D, E & F, focus on Dames & Moore, Zivotofsky and Hamdi.  Consider how these cases should be analyzed under the frameworks developed by the different Justices in   Youngstown.

 

Supplemental Reading #2 (Reading List Part II.D, excerpting the Zivotofsky case) is available below.

 

A Venezuela-related hypothetical is posted below.  This is just for practice and is not to turn in or discuss in any detail in class.

 

NO CLASS Monday, January 19, 2026 (King holiday)

 

Assignment for Wednesday, January 14, 2026

 

Reading List Part II.A, B & C, focus on Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. Sawyer (the Steel Seizure case), opinions of Justices Black, Frankfurter, Jackson and Vinson.

 

Supplemental Reading #1 (Reading List Part II.B) is available below.

 

Assignment for Monday, January 12, 2026

 

Text of the Constitution (pages 1571-1589 of the casebook), focus on Articles I, II, III and VI, and Amendment I.

 

Text, pp. 1-22 (introduction)

 

Consider and be prepared to discuss the following: Why do we need a Constitution?  What purposes does a constitutional system serve, as compared to a system of simple majority rule?  How is Constitutional Law different from other law? What are the sources of Constitutional Law?

 

 

COURSE DOWNLOADS

 

Syllabus

Reading List -- Unit 1 (separation of powers)

 

Supplemental Reading #1: Historical Introduction to Executive Power (for 1/14)

Supplemental Reading #2: Zivotofsky v. Kerry (excerpt) (for 1/21)

Constitutional Law hypothetical #1 (presidential power)

Supplemental Reading #3: Trump v. United States (excerpts) (for 1/26)

Constitutional Law hypothetical #2 (presidential power)

Supplemental Reading #4: Gundy v. United States (Gorsuch dissent) (excerpts) (for 1/28)

Constitutional Law hypothetical #3 (presidential immunities)

Constitutional Law hypothetical #4 (delegation)

Supplemental Reading #5: Massachusetts v. EPA and Clapper v. Amnesty International (for 2/11)

Supplemental Reading #6: Zivotofsky v. Clinton (for 2/16)

 

Writing Assignment #1 (separation of powers) (due 2/16 at 10:00 am)

 

Reading List -- Unit 2 (Federalism)

 

Constitutional Law hypothetical #5 (federal power)

Supplemental Reading #7: Gregory v. Ashcroft and Bond v. United States (for 3/4)

Supplemental Reading #8: Crosby and Gade excerpts (for 3/16)